11 de November de 2019

From Speaking in Analysis to Writing a Case – Jeff Erbe (NLS)

Working on the theme ‘constructions’ stirred questions about the relationship between the speaking body in analysis and ‘what is written’…


Working on the theme ‘constructions’ stirred questions about the relationship between the speaking body in analysis and ‘what is written’ (equivocation between the letter and writing). I extracted the following S1s from the argument: (1) who constructs (analysand or analyst)?; (2) what is the relationship between case presentation and construction of a case?; and (3) can a Pass testimony be considered the moment when an analysand becomes analyst, through the construction of their own case?

What is urgent for Freud in the twilight of his life? Construction. Miller proposes reading Freud’s text as an intervention directed at psychoanalysts, in which Freud is punctuating his oeuvre. As such, something in his text resonates for us. We detect an accent on the signifiers “preliminary labor” and “incomplete substitute”. With Freud’s emphasis on incompleteness, we discover bricolage overtaking the ideal of repressed memory, foreshadowing the ultimate encounter with the hole of what cannot be said.

In La passe du parlêtre, Miller highlights the gap between truth and the real. Freud fights to keep this gap wedged open. In analysis, the letter in what is said marks the edge of this gap, and the construction necessary to reach this limit is synonymous with traversing the fantasy. Following Lacan, Miller makes this very claim in Marginalia, that construction is the task of the analysand and the analyst is to act. Jorge Assef specifies that the analyst’s intervention is constitutive of the analysand’s construction and thus “the construction is done between the analyst and analysand”.

Let’s return to the question, “who constructs?” If Lacan countered Freud’s position—that it is not the analyst but the analysand—why does this question persist? The resonance of Freud’s text suggests something remains unsettled. Miller agrees with Lacan that the analysand constructs, but he also retains Freud’s position that the analyst also constructs by structuring a case. Thus fantasy is the construction of the analysand, case is that of the analyst.

This distinction can be made in terms of writing. Construction of the fantasy is sustained at the level of the analysand’s speech, whereas the analyst formalizes this work through writing. One version is the case presentation. It is differentiated from the analysand’s construction, for example, by including elements that are extimate to the analysis (e.g., supervision interventions).

The Pass testimony is another variation of the analyst’s construction. It is different from the case presentation in that the writing and presentation of one’s own analysis constitutes a Pass from analysand to analyst. The audience for this construction is no longer the analyst as Other, but the School. This procedure is a series of moments, in which we find at the end something of the “incomplete substitute” remains. In practice, what unfolds is a Mobius relation between speaking and writing.

What these three constructions—fantasy, case presentation, and Pass—share is a labor that is always preliminary to a recalcitrant encounter with the real irreducible opacity of jouissance.

in Lettere
Related Posts

A Challenge to the Universal – Maria Cristina Aguirre

10 de outubro de 2019

10 de outubro de 2019

I work in a municipally run general hospital located in Queens, New York, in the outpatient clinic (also called Ambulatory...

LA SEXUALIDAD EN TIEMPOS DE FEMINISMOS – Gabriela Camaly (EOL)

9 de setembro de 2019

9 de setembro de 2019

Este texto corresponde a la intervención realizada en la mesa plenaria “Versiones del amor”, en las VIII Jornadas sobre Lo...

Quatre perspectives sur la différence sexuelle – Daniel Roy (ECF)

9 de setembro de 2019

9 de setembro de 2019

  Tous les deux ans, le Comité d’initiative de l’Institut de l’Enfant soumet à Jacques-Alain Miller des propositions de thème...

Mujeres y Vida – O la Maldición de las Criadoras. Por Marie-Hélène Brousse (ECF

13 de agosto de 2019

13 de agosto de 2019

Traducción: María Paz Varela ¿Han visto o escuchado a Kay Ivey? ¡Una mujer vieja y poderosa! Ella es la actual...

Una memoria da campionato – Marco Focchi (SLP)

6 de agosto de 2019

6 de agosto de 2019

Uno dei campi in cui le neuroscienze prediligono esercitarsi è quello della memoria. Dico esercitarsi perché si tratta propriamente di...

Une affaire de corps – Patrick Monribot (ECF))

2 de agosto de 2019

2 de agosto de 2019

« Le réel, (…), c’est le mystère du corps parlant, c’est le mystère de l’inconscient. »[1] La phrase a été...

Por onde anda a “sensibilidade inteligente”? – Marcia Stival Onyszkiewicz (EBP)

7 de julho de 2019

7 de julho de 2019

Por onde anda a “sensibilidade inteligente”[1]? Inicio minha participação no Blog da AMP, salientando ecos extraídos do cotidiano e que...

La “sensibilitée intelligente”, où est-elle ? – Marcia Stival Onyszkiewicz (EBP)

7 de julho de 2019

7 de julho de 2019

La “sensibilitée intelligente”, où est-elle ?[1] Je commence ma participation au blog de l’AMP, en soulignant les échos extraits de...

Pluralisation des ségrégations – Alice Delarue (ECF)

5 de julho de 2019

5 de julho de 2019

Publié sur HebdoBlog La ségrégation, sous ses formes actuelles, concerne de façon brûlante la psychanalyse, du moins celle qui est...

Una carta de amor – Paula Rodríguez Acquarone (EOL)

4 de julho de 2019

4 de julho de 2019

Me pregunté a propósito del título de esta mesa, cuantas versiones del amor habría en el libro Feminismos[2], si uno...

A la pointe de l’érotisme féminin – Anaëlle Lebovits-Quenehen (ECF)

17 de junho de 2019

17 de junho de 2019

Dans son sens courant, l’érotisme relève du désir amoureux, ou plus exactement, de ce qui éveille ce désir. L’érotisme féminin...

La complejidad de la validación científica. Saber y poder – por Gustavo Stiglitz (EOL)

16 de junho de 2019

16 de junho de 2019

Observamos que en general, las legislaciones en salud mental toman a los llamados criterios científicos, como tabla de orientación para...

Dangerous Attraction, politics and religion – by Daniela Affonso (EBP)

13 de junho de 2019

13 de junho de 2019

I’ve always imagined the following scene as one of solemnity. Freud, invited by North-American psychologist Stanley Hall to speak at...

Atração perigosa, política e religião – Daniela Affonso (EBP)

13 de junho de 2019

13 de junho de 2019

TEXTO EM PORTUGUÊS   Sempre imaginei a cena seguinte como um momento solene. Freud, convidado a ir aos Estados Unidos...

All- Inclusive… Language? – by Isolda Alvarez

6 de junho de 2019

6 de junho de 2019

The beginning of this century has brought many changes… we have been catching up with them long time ago. One...

Comments
Deixe uma resposta

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *

Esse site utiliza o Akismet para reduzir spam. Aprenda como seus dados de comentários são processados.