17 de October de 2019

When the State becomes Troumatism – Isolda Alvarez (NLS) ENGLISH

Beyond the political ideologies to which someone can affiliate or not, a political position is inevitably inhabited by the ethical…


Beyond the political ideologies to which someone can affiliate or not, a political position is inevitably inhabited by the ethical stand of that one who holds a certain political position. If the political position is correlative to the ethical position, psychoanalysis cannot remain silent and subtracted from the problematic of certain political positions that we find in the contemporary world, taking into account that the ethics that matter to us, is not the ethics in the philosophical sense, as a mental construct. For he ethics that concern us as psychoanalysts is the     ethics concerning each one of us, if someone becomes or

not responsible for its singular way of jouissance.

Kansuke Yamamoto. Reminiscence, 1953.

If one of the indications made by Jacques Lacan, is that the “psychoanalyst must be up to the subjectivity of its time”, psychoanalysis has somethings to say about politics: up to the extent that we are able to read how the hole manifests itself at the time, in that way , we will be more aware how each singular jouissance is organized in its singular way.

Neither the State nor the Judiciary are in charge of what we call singularity. The laws are made “for all” in an attempt to regulate and bring some order to a collectiveness. Finally, the laws have been created and changed as a response to different emergencies of the real, a real that cannot be captured in the civilizing mechanism. One of the main functions of the State is precisely to offer a certain guaranty, which however does not exhaust or dominate, nor ameliorate the emergencies of the real, but it establishes possible responses that at the level of the collectiveness to allow the running of a society.

Now, what happens when the State itself becomes the traumatic agent? What do we find when the State makes present the troumatism?

When a country exceeds the international standards of child malnutrition (Venezuela), when one of the immigration policies of a State generates more than 3000 children separated from their parents and located in cages, some of which were given for adoption to American families because they had no way how to contact their parents (USA), when it is a Communist State in which any gesture of privacy is interpreted as a threat, or a state in which the content of the internet and your participation in such networks is translated as “good or bad behavior “, evaluation wether you can travel freely or not, be able to buy certain supplies, etc. (China), or when one of the penalties for adultery includes stoning … Lacanian psychoanalysis cannot stay mute and inert, is in its ethics to speak out.

In order to be able to speak out and stand up – beyond the comfort of our offices and the space of the School- it is necessary to have a political conjuncture in which that would be possible. That is why, the existence of psychoanalysis has as a condition, a political system that includes the differences, diversity of singularities and, and therefore a system that respects the private space. So far, the best version that we have known is called Democracy. System that is going through a shift of paradigm, in a moment in which its own foundations are questioned, not only at the level of rhetoric but mainly by the political actors that inhabit it.

It’s not about ideologies it’s about facts. And while we can say that the facts are interpretable, at the same time there is a dimension of the facts that is closer to the real than to the possible interpretation that one can give to them. In Venezuela, for example, it has been a “de facto” sustained genocide, covered up by those in the supposed left ideologies that are neither ideologies nor left. In the United States, we have an immigration policy that kidnaps children and then delivers them to anyone, like any other object of consumption.

If the Lacanian psychoanalysis takes as a principle of its action, the act at the core of the singular ethics of who we call parlêtre, the participation in politics for each analyst would only be possible from the principles that guide and sustain that singular ethics. Principle contrary to the usual basis of a political party, namely: the connection between alienation and the identification that sustains and feeds up itself in the mass phenomenon.

It would then be a matter of making a style of politics that does not support an Other: a policy without an Other; this is our continue effort in the School, a device that functions as a link and cause to sustain the analytical discourse at the condition that the School does not become another version of the Other.

More often we find policies from the State that make present more the troumatism than the guarantee expected from this entity. The symbolic order that the State is supposed to have, will have to be reconsidered. The subjectivity of the time has taught us new ways of dealing with the real, inventions of the contemporary. Politically speaking we will have to wait for the answers that will come, that would have to be invented once again in the effort to deal with the real, knowing that “dealing with” has no end. It never ceases.

Related Posts

From Speaking in Analysis to Writing a Case – Jeff Erbe (NLS)

17 de outubro de 2019

17 de outubro de 2019

Working on the theme ‘constructions’ stirred questions about the relationship between the speaking body in analysis and ‘what is written’...

A Challenge to the Universal – Maria Cristina Aguirre

10 de outubro de 2019

10 de outubro de 2019

I work in a municipally run general hospital located in Queens, New York, in the outpatient clinic (also called Ambulatory...

LA SEXUALIDAD EN TIEMPOS DE FEMINISMOS – Gabriela Camaly (EOL)

9 de setembro de 2019

9 de setembro de 2019

Este texto corresponde a la intervención realizada en la mesa plenaria “Versiones del amor”, en las VIII Jornadas sobre Lo...

Quatre perspectives sur la différence sexuelle – Daniel Roy (ECF)

9 de setembro de 2019

9 de setembro de 2019

  Tous les deux ans, le Comité d’initiative de l’Institut de l’Enfant soumet à Jacques-Alain Miller des propositions de thème...

Mujeres y Vida – O la Maldición de las Criadoras. Por Marie-Hélène Brousse (ECF

13 de agosto de 2019

13 de agosto de 2019

Traducción: María Paz Varela ¿Han visto o escuchado a Kay Ivey? ¡Una mujer vieja y poderosa! Ella es la actual...

Una memoria da campionato – Marco Focchi (SLP)

6 de agosto de 2019

6 de agosto de 2019

Uno dei campi in cui le neuroscienze prediligono esercitarsi è quello della memoria. Dico esercitarsi perché si tratta propriamente di...

Une affaire de corps – Patrick Monribot (ECF))

2 de agosto de 2019

2 de agosto de 2019

« Le réel, (…), c’est le mystère du corps parlant, c’est le mystère de l’inconscient. »[1] La phrase a été...

Por onde anda a “sensibilidade inteligente”? – Marcia Stival Onyszkiewicz (EBP)

7 de julho de 2019

7 de julho de 2019

Por onde anda a “sensibilidade inteligente”[1]? Inicio minha participação no Blog da AMP, salientando ecos extraídos do cotidiano e que...

La “sensibilitée intelligente”, où est-elle ? – Marcia Stival Onyszkiewicz (EBP)

7 de julho de 2019

7 de julho de 2019

La “sensibilitée intelligente”, où est-elle ?[1] Je commence ma participation au blog de l’AMP, en soulignant les échos extraits de...

Pluralisation des ségrégations – Alice Delarue (ECF)

5 de julho de 2019

5 de julho de 2019

Publié sur HebdoBlog La ségrégation, sous ses formes actuelles, concerne de façon brûlante la psychanalyse, du moins celle qui est...

Una carta de amor – Paula Rodríguez Acquarone (EOL)

4 de julho de 2019

4 de julho de 2019

Me pregunté a propósito del título de esta mesa, cuantas versiones del amor habría en el libro Feminismos[2], si uno...

A la pointe de l’érotisme féminin – Anaëlle Lebovits-Quenehen (ECF)

17 de junho de 2019

17 de junho de 2019

Dans son sens courant, l’érotisme relève du désir amoureux, ou plus exactement, de ce qui éveille ce désir. L’érotisme féminin...

La complejidad de la validación científica. Saber y poder – por Gustavo Stiglitz (EOL)

16 de junho de 2019

16 de junho de 2019

Observamos que en general, las legislaciones en salud mental toman a los llamados criterios científicos, como tabla de orientación para...

Dangerous Attraction, politics and religion – by Daniela Affonso (EBP)

13 de junho de 2019

13 de junho de 2019

I’ve always imagined the following scene as one of solemnity. Freud, invited by North-American psychologist Stanley Hall to speak at...

Atração perigosa, política e religião – Daniela Affonso (EBP)

13 de junho de 2019

13 de junho de 2019

TEXTO EM PORTUGUÊS   Sempre imaginei a cena seguinte como um momento solene. Freud, convidado a ir aos Estados Unidos...

Comments
Deixe uma resposta

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *

Esse site utiliza o Akismet para reduzir spam. Aprenda como seus dados de comentários são processados.